• a sort of postmodern flâneur
  • bio
  • essays
  • 7th press
  • 💿
  • playlists
  • mirror stage
  • ring ring
  • Menu

rr

  • a sort of postmodern flâneur
  • bio
  • essays
  • 7th press
  • 💿
  • playlists
  • mirror stage
  • ring ring

Jessica Chastain in The Savant, which was scheduled to premiere on Apple TV+ in September but has been postponed.

Censorship is Not a Cure: The case of Apple's The Savant

September 06, 2025

In September 2025, Apple TV+ took an unusual step: it indefinitely postponed the release of the miniseries The Savant, starring Jessica Chastain, without providing any clear explanation. According to the New York Times, The Savant is a fictional story loosely inspired by the real-life case of a woman who works to anticipate potential attacks by monitoring the violent rhetoric of extremist groups online. What’s interesting is that, despite its urgent theme, the series appears to avoid any political stance. It doesn't mention parties, cite real events, or make direct accusations. Everything seems to be handled with great care. And yet... it disappeared. It wasn't banned or canceled. Just “paused.” In silence. As if the world wasn't ready.

Why would a company with Apple’s power and reach hesitate before a work that, according to NY Times television critic Mike Hale, is surprisingly anodyne? The most immediate answer would be political. The postponement occurred shortly after the assassination of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk, at a time when programs like Jimmy Kimmel’s were also temporarily suspended. In a country where conservatism has been pressuring studios, publishers, and platforms, perhaps Apple simply calculated the potential backlash and preferred to avoid controversy.

But I believe there is more to it. Apple is known for its image management. It is an institution that, above all, focuses on how it will be perceived. And The Savant, despite being cautious, handles a sensitive subject and turns the performance of violence into a television spectacle. The series tries to turn hatred into entertainment, even if with good intentions. And perhaps that is what is unsettling.

This fear isn’t new. We’ve seen this story before. In the 1980s, in the UK, the moral panic over "video nasties" emerged: a wave of censorship targeting horror films on VHS, accused of corrupting the youth and inciting crimes. Often, those leading these protests hadn’t even watched the films they condemned. But fear overruled logic. In the 1990s and 2000s, the panic shifted to video games. After the Columbine High School massacre, games like Doom and Grand Theft Auto (GTA) became media villains. Parents, politicians, and TV hosts called for censorship. The message was always the same: banning the images as if they were the cause of violence.

But today, the situation is even more complicated. Visual culture is not just entertainment; it forms the structure of the world. Our lives unfold through images: stories, reels, avatars, profiles. Every selfie, every recording, every edit—all are constructions of meaning and identity. We live in and through simulations. And what was once a metaphor is now reality. In our current digital society, images do more than illustrate the world: they are the world.

Perhaps that is why Apple hesitates, and The Savant was not postponed because it was too radical, but because it was too real. It presents a character who is not so distant from today: the aggrieved white man, who channels frustration into violence. And it shows that he is shaped by algorithms, forums, and videos, just like many others we have already seen.

But the problem isn't the images. It's what we do with them. Society tends to outsource responsibility to fiction instead of confronting its own collapses. It prefers to censor stories rather than face the truths that emerge silently. Censorship has never been a real solution. In fact, it often exposes the deepest panic through acts of erasing. Because what's really at stake isn't just the fear of what will be seen, but the fear of what will be felt—what will be recognized.

We live in a time when we need to relearn how to see, to distinguish between what is artificial and what is real. And this isn't achieved with filters or bans. It’s done through presence, dialogue, and courage. The future depends not on the images we erase, but on the stories we choose to tell.

 

This piece was originally published as a monthly column on Media and Visual Culture for the Brazilian digital newspaper O DEMOCRATA. You can access the original text in Portuguese [here].

Prev / Next

blog


Featured
Mar 10, 2026
The Politics of Laughter: 30 Years of The Birdcage
Mar 10, 2026
Mar 10, 2026
Feb 7, 2026
Eye to Eye: 35 Years of The Silence of the Lambs
Feb 7, 2026
Feb 7, 2026
Sep 6, 2025
Censorship is Not a Cure: The case of Apple's The Savant
Sep 6, 2025
Sep 6, 2025
Jul 5, 2025
Revenge of the Analog: What the new wave of nostalgia reveals about digital burnout
Jul 5, 2025
Jul 5, 2025
Jun 7, 2025
The Spectacle of F1 and the Double Standard for Male Heroes
Jun 7, 2025
Jun 7, 2025
Feb 8, 2023
holy selfie: notes on selfie culture
Feb 8, 2023
Feb 8, 2023
Dec 12, 2021
notes on film abstraction
Dec 12, 2021
Dec 12, 2021
Apr 28, 2018
the disney channel games star machine
Apr 28, 2018
Apr 28, 2018